Midpoint+Analysis+of+Projects

Midpoint Review of Major Assignments

This review is a qualitative analysis of the existing and potential possibilities for major assignments in EDFL 675b. No evaluative judgments are made regarding the projects. There are seventeen (17) participants in the course, including the instructor.

__Types of project__

9 wikis for school, church or other 4 research and evaluation projects 1 conference presentation 2 online groups, non-wiki 1 unknown

__External sites created to date__ 6 in wikispaces; 3 are linked to Scot’s wikispace, 3 are not linked

__Proposed Project Status (my perception based on limited data)__

8 very complete, running and up to date 4 quite complete, up and running 3 getting started, evidence of progress 2 non existent, no evidence of any progress being made

__Project alignment with course objectives and activity goals__

10 very close alignment 3 close alignment 2 aligned 1 loosely aligned 1 not defined

__Interactivity: Interactivity or potential interactivity designed and implemented in the project__

3 currently interactive 6 good potential for interactivity 3 possible potential for interactivity 5 not designed for interactivity